The primary job of any scientific Introduction is to establish the purpose for doing the experiment that is to be reported. Give relevant details, e. Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective.
Record your data in tables and use the tabulated data to do the graphs. The Discussion section often begins by making a statement as to whether the findings in the Results support or do not support the expected findings stated in the hypothesis. Be wary of mistaking the reiteration of a specific finding for an interpretation because it may confuse the reader.
Describe the patterns, principles, relationships your results show.
If a study that you cited does not support your findings, don't ignore it--clearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs. Are your results similar or different?
Journal Title, volume number issue numberpage numbers A simple way to write your reference section is use Google scholar.
Most standard burettes allow measurement to the nearest 0. Two or three studies is sufficient. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings It is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to discover and not to prove.
What does it all mean?
Give the big picture: Do not be verbose or repetitive Be concise and make your points clearly Avoid using jargon Follow a logical stream of thought; in general, interpret and discuss the significance of your findings in the same sequence you described them in your results section [a notable exception is to begin by highlighting an unexpected result or finding] Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works or prior studies in the past tense If needed, use subheadings to help organize your discussion or to categorize your interpretations into themes II.
Describe what additional research might resolve contradictions or explain exceptions. To create a miniature version of the report, abstracts usually consist of one-sentence summaries of each of the parts of the report sometimes two sentences are necessary for especially complex parts.
It is customary to write the final burette volume in the first row, the initial burette volume in the second row and the titre in the third row.
Numbers which can never exceed 1. If your hypothesis is unlikely, why are you testing it? Avoid interpreting the results save this for the discussion.
For guidance on completing the calculations, there are a number of online resources.The discussion can start with a summary of the aims and the results (write about x-fold or % changes rather than just repeating the results) You should try to explain the results, but only within the context of the study - integrating swags of theory into the discussion is not necessary and leads to rambling reports.
Scientific report discussion Examples - Free download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free. 3 Examples of good scientific discussions for practical investigations involving seed germination (grade 8 level) with comments for improvement.4/4(5).
An excerpt from the Discussion section of a psychology report Both the alternative hypotheses for consensus and distinctiveness information were supported: high consensus and high distinctiveness information creates an external attribution while low consensus and low distinctiveness information causes an internal attribution.
Discussion. What the results mean, whether they were as expected (and if not, why not), any problems with the practical etc.
For example, a result outside the normal reference range could indicate one or more disease states, which should be mentioned. Unlike an essay, a report has a formalised structure. Taking into account disciplinary differences, scientific or laboratory reports written by undergraduates share the same format as scientific reports written by academics for publication.
Research Methods › Report Writing. How to Write a Lab Report.
Saul McLeod, published The report should have a thread of argument linking the prediction in the introduction to the content in the discussion. 1. Title Page: This must indicate what the study is about.
It must include the IV & bigskyquartet.com: Saul Mcleod.Download